Might circumcision be a good idea after all?
The usual set of arguments are that on hte one hand, yes, it does indeed protect against certain diseases. However, at the same time, it reduces male sensitivity and this might thus mean (and is usually taken to mean so) that this reduces the total amount of sexual pleasure.
On balance, circumcision is therefore a bad idea.
However, an intriguing point has just been made. Reduced sensitivity will in fact mean longer is pent in each specific instance os sec. This, surely, is an increase in total sexual pleasure?
Is this thus yet another reason why circumcision should be promoted?